The Story of Wheat ❤
Many of my clients ask about wheat, what's all the fuss about and how does it affect my health? Modern agriculture and it's connection to the health of our bodies always amazes me. Looking at wheat and it's evolution over time, is the perfect example of this. Here's the skinny from Wheat Belly by Dr. Wlliam Davis.
❤
❤
It’s in the Bible. In
Deuteronomy, Moses describes the Promised Land as “a land of wheat and barley
and vineyards.” Bread is central to religious ritual. Jews celebrate Passover
with unleavened matzo to commemorate the flight of the Israelites from Egypt.
Christians consume wafers representing the body of Christ. Muslims regard
unleavened “naan” bread as sacred, insisting it be stored upright and never
thrown away in public. In the Bible, bread is a metaphor for bountiful harvest,
a time of plenty, freedom from starvation, even salvation.
Don’t we break bread with
friends and family? Isn’t something new and wonderful “the best thing since
sliced bread”? “Taking the bread out of someone’s mouth” is to deprive that
person of a fundamental necessity. Bread is a nearly universal diet staple:
chapatti in India, tsoureki in Greece, pita in the Middle East, Aebelskiver in
Denmark, naan bya for breakfast in Burma, glazed donuts any old time in the
United States.
The notion that a
foodstuff so fundamental, so deeply ingrained in the human experience, can be
bad for us is, well, unsettling and counter to long-held cultural views of
wheat and bread. But today’s bread bears little resemblance to the loaves that
emerged from our forebears’ ovens. Bread and other foods made of wheat have
sustained humans for centuries, but the wheat of our ancestors is not the same
as modern commercial wheat that reaches your breakfast, lunch, and dinner
table. From the original strains of wild grass harvested by early humans, wheat
has exploded to more than 25,000 varieties, virtually all of them the result of
human intervention.
In the waning days of the
Pleistocene period, around 8500 BC, millennia before any Christian, Jew, or
Muslim walked the earth, before the Egyptians, Greek, and Roman empires, the
Natufians led a semi-nomadic life roaming the Fertile Crescent (now Syria,
Jordan, Lebanon, Israel, and Iraq), supplementing their hunting and gathering
by harvesting indigenous plants. They harvested the ancestor of modern wheat,
einkorn, from fields that flourished wildly in open plains. Meals of gazelle,
boar, fowl, and ibex were rounded out with dishes of wild-growing grain and
fruit. Relics like those excavated at the Tell Abu Hureyra settlement in what
is now central Syria suggest skilled use of tools such as sickles and mortars
to harvest and grind grains, as well as storage pits for stockpiling harvested
food. Remains of harvested wheat have been found at archaeological digs in Tell
Aswad, Jericho, Nahal Hemar, Navali Cori, and other locales. Wheat was ground
by hand, then eaten as porridge. The modern concept of bread leavened by yeast
would not come along for several thousand years.
Natufians harvested wild
einkorn wheat and may have purposefully stored seeds to sow in areas of their
own choosing the next season. Einkorn wheat eventually became an essential
component of the Natufian diet, reducing the need for hunting and gathering.
The shift from harvesting wild to cultivating grain was a fundamental change
that shaped their subsequent migratory behavior, as well as the development of
tools, language, and culture. It marked the beginning of agriculture, a
lifestyle that required long-term commitment to more or less permanent
settlement, a turning point in the course of human civilization. Growing grains
and other foods yielded a surplus of food that allowed for occupational
specialization, government, and all the elaborate trappings of culture (while,
in contrast, the absence of agriculture arrested cultural development at
something resembling Neolithic life).
Over most of the ten
thousand years that wheat has occupied a prominent place in the caves, huts,
adobes, and on the tables of humans, what started out as harvested einkorn,
then emmer, followed by cultivated Triticum aestivum, changed gradually and
only in small fits and starts. The wheat of the seventeenth century was the
wheat of the eighteenth century, which in turn was much the same as the wheat
of the nineteenth century and the first half of the twentieth century. Riding your
oxcart through the countryside during any of these centuries, you’d see fields
of four-foot-tall “amber waves of grain” swaying in the breeze. Crude human
wheat breeding efforts yielded hit-and-miss, year-over-year incremental
modifications, some successful, most not, and even a discerning eye would be
hard pressed to tell the difference between the wheat of early twentieth
century farming from its many centuries of predecessors.
During the nineteenth and
early twentieth centuries, as in many preceding centuries, wheat changed
little. The Pillsbury’s Best XXXX flour my grandmother used to make her famous
sour cream muffins in 1940 was little different from the flour of her
great-great-grandmother sixty years earlier or, for that matter, from that of her
great-great-great-great-great-great-grandmother another two centuries before
that. Grinding of wheat had become more mechanized in the twentieth century,
yielding finer flour on a larger scale, but the basic composition of the flour
remained much the same.
That all ended in the
latter part of the twentieth century, when an upheaval in hybridization methods
transformed this grain. What now passes for wheat has changed, not through the
forces of drought or disease or a Darwinian scramble for survival, but through
human intervention. As a result, wheat has undergone a more drastic
transformation, it’s been stretched, sewed, cut, and stitched back together to
yield something entirely unique, nearly unrecognizable compared to the original
and yet still called by the same name: wheat.
Modern commercial wheat
production has been intent on enhancing features such as increased yield,
decreased production costs, and large-scale delivery of a consistent commodity
product. All the while, virtually no questions have been asked about whether
these features are compatible with human health. I submit that, somewhere along
the way during wheat’s history, perhaps five thousand years ago but more likely
fifty years ago, wheat changed.
The result: A loaf of bread, biscuit, or pancake of today is different than
its counterpart of a thousand years ago, different even from what our
grandmothers made. They might look the same, even taste much the same, but
there are biochemical differences. Small changes in wheat protein structure can
spell the difference between a devastating immune response to wheat protein
versus no immune response at all.
Q: How does this modified wheat
make us fat, exactly?
A: It contains amylopectin A, which
is more efficiently converted to blood sugar than just about any other
carbohydrate, including table sugar. In fact, two slices of whole wheat bread
increase blood sugar to a higher level than a candy bar does. And then, after
about two hours, your blood sugar plunges and you get shaky, your brain feels
foggy, you're hungry. So let's say you have an English muffin for breakfast.
Two hours later you're starving, so you have a handful of crackers, and then
some potato chips, and your blood sugar rises again. That cycle of highs and
lows just keeps going throughout the day, so you're constantly feeling hungry
and constantly eating. Dieticians have responded to this by advising that we
graze throughout the day, which is just nonsense. If you eliminate wheat from
your diet, you're no longer hungry between meals because you've stopped that
cycle. You've cut out the appetite stimulant, and consequently you lose weight
very quickly. I've seen this with thousands of patients.
A: You can trigger effects you don't perceive. Small low-density
lipoprotein [LDL] particles form when you're eating lots of carbohydrates, and
they are responsible for atherosclerotic plaque, which in turn triggers heart disease
and stroke. So even if you're a slender, vigorous, healthy person, you're still
triggering the formation of small LDL particles. And second, carbohydrates
increase your blood sugars, which cause this process of glycation, that is, the
glucose modification of proteins. If I glycate the proteins in my eyes, I get
cataracts. If I glycate the cartilage of my knees and hips, I get arthritis. If
I glycate small LDL, I'm more prone to atherosclerosis. So it's a twofold
effect. And if you don't start out slender and keep eating that fair trade,
organically grown whole wheat bread that sounds so healthy, you're repeatedly
triggering high blood sugars and are going to wind up with more visceral fat.
This isn't just what I call the wheat belly that you can see, flopping over
your belt, but the fat around your internal organs. And as visceral fat
accumulates, you risk responses like diabetes and heart disease.
Q: What results have been observed
by patients cutting wheat out of their diets?
"Cutting wheat products from the
diet, proved to be the dietary turning point that reduced my appetite,
accelerated weight loss, and just helped me feel clearer, more energetic and
happier than I'd felt in years.” According to Dr. William Davis, the author of
Wheat Belly.
Dr. Davis then transferred this experience to his patients and
witnessed similar results: weight loss, especially from the abdomen; reversal
of abnormal cholesterol patterns without drugs; drops in blood pressure and blood
sugar; and a host of other improvements in multiple abnormal health conditions.
Q: What about gluten-free options?
So you kiss all things wheat goodbye. And you’ve come
to see there are endless gluten-free options only to later learn that
gluten-free foods made with replacement flours like cornstarch, tapioca starch,
potato starch, and rice starch are also very destructive, since they make
visceral fat grow, send blood sugar through the roof, and cause hypertension
and heart disease.
With Love,
Christina ❤
Sources: Wheat Belly by Dr. William Davis, Dr. Mercola and
Dr. Robert J. Johnson
Comments
Post a Comment